主演：朱莉娅·罗伯茨大卫·布里斯宾阿尔伯特·芬尼维勒特·罗德里格斯康查塔·费雷尔JackGill史考蒂·莱文沃斯杰蒙妮·德拉佩纳艾琳·布鲁克维奇-埃利斯艾伦·艾克哈特玛格·海根柏格杰米·哈罗德斯嘉丽·波莫尔斯T·J·塞恩乔·克里斯特迈克尔·哈尔尼威廉姆·拉金米密·肯尼迪斯科特·索尔斯切莉·琼斯KristinaMalota韦德·威廉姆斯崔西·沃特DonSnell迈克尔·山姆伯格吉娜·盖莱果彼德·考约特维尼·考克斯NormaMaldonadoEdM
类型：剧情传记导演：史蒂文·索德伯格 状态：正片 年份：2000 地区：美国 语言：英语 豆瓣ID：1293050热度：0 ℃ 时间：2024-06-11 16:43:03
温馨提示：[DVD：标准清晰版] [BD：高清无水印] [HD：高清版] [TS：抢先非清晰版] - 其中，BD和HD版本不太适合网速过慢的用户观看。
这个戏厉害的地方在于【全方位360度捧女主】！这种“捧”是有技巧的，这种“捧”不是用634个老百姓站一排硬赞，“上帝派来的天使就是你吧！”“你那么有魅力有耐心有个性，我们都love你……”如果这样，我肯定关掉、不受这种玛丽苏荼毒撒！
跟高大上的女性励志不一样，这戏的女主台词很粗俗，但听来都让人非常解气。她的愤怒是出于最朴素的同情心。她有孩子，看到别人家漂亮小女孩得了癌症不能上学她愤怒。她是女人，看到其他女人因为污染而得病要切去子宫和乳房而愤怒。她的执着和不计代价是骨子里的倔强与来自草根的义气。她的粗口最能撕开敌人虚伪的面具，让观众动容。茱莉娅的表演也做到了收放自如。斥责自己老板不尽力（其实是误会）、反驳男友“工作就是为了挣口饭吃”的论调、与合作方据理力争等地方都很棒。最震撼莫过于茱莉娅面对对方律师说的那段：“你的脊椎值多少钱？你的子宫值多少钱？自己想好了数目再乘以100，就是我们要谈的赔偿价钱！”对刚要拿起桌上的水要喝的对方律师她说：“这就是我们从PE&G公司周围特地采回来给你们准备的水样。”一番话铿锵有力，看着傲慢的对方无奈放下水杯灰溜溜地离席而去，让人觉得，女主这时的没文化真【可爱】！
女主打官司不专业，连电脑软件使用证书都没有。但十八个月的努力后，她能清晰流利地背出所有634名污染受害人的自然情况：电话、得病症状，甚至这些人谁和谁有怎样的亲戚关系。她用美貌与智慧以及女性特有的同情心与敏感，换取了委托人的信任，她因病请假1天，委托人就着急打电话说怕被别的律师骗。这是来自百姓最真挚的爱戴。这让她的形象，远远超越了那个跟她合作的法学院毕业的高材生律师。可以说女主合作的人也好，对手也好，学历身家都超过她，但以影片的效果看，她的魅力与气场远远超过了其他人，成为毫无疑问的核心人物。主创们很清楚只有女主人设立得住，片子才能有说服力。他们非常好地做到了这一点，电影也就成功了。
这是难得的女性励志题材。环保的严峻问题也被揭示得很透彻。如今全球雾霾、水污染等问题越加激烈，片子再看依然很让人感慨。真希望这样的电影再多一点，而这种根据真实事件改编的影片所反映的问题在现实中再少一点。
看到一个小八卦：故事的原型Erin Brockovich本人在电影里也出境了，饰演了一个叫Julia R 的女侍者。（附上楼主第一次想在文章里加入的PO图，电影里Erin在回答老板为什么别人容许她进门查资料时说：“因为我有大咪咪。”老板立刻哑火了，哈哈。依图看来，Erin本人……确实不错，昂。）
<图片1>
另外，转载影片女主原型Erin Brockovich在其个人网站中对这部奥斯卡电影的评论，有4个方面的重点可以确认：1、她承认她本人就是穿的像电影里一样性感；2、电影里98%的成份和真实事件都是一致的；3、电影中造成污染至人伤亡的恶棍公司PG&E的所作所为确实如此。4、那么由于时间的关系呢~，她那三个可爱的孩子今年（2013年）已经30、28、22岁了！
PS:大家大概都知道了吧，电影中，拮据的朱莉亚罗伯茨带着三个孩子去饭店吃饭那一幕，女服务员的角色就是真的Erin Brockovich客串玩票出演的，能看得出，本尊的漂亮程度不亚于朱莉亚罗伯茨。
摘录她评论电影原文如下：People ask me all the time, is the movie true and accurate? YES, the movie was true and probably 98% accurate. They took very few creative licenses.
Yes, I did dress that way. I was actually taken back by the response of many people regarding my wardrobe. I just dressed that way because it was fun and I liked it. I was taught never to judge a book by its cover. My clothing was nothing more than a cover and I have never thought that anyone was smart or stupid or anything else by the way they chose to dress.
Yes, I had a potty mouth in the movie and I still do.
On a couple of occasions I have caught the headline that I am a trash talking crusader. If you are referring to my potty mouth then I am the trash talker. No, I am not trash from the other side of the tracks. I come from quite an educated family. My dad is an industrial engineer and my mom is an English major specializing in journalism.
Yes, I was a three time divorcee with three children.So what ?.People don’t realize that I started my work in the Hinkley case in 1991 when Elizabeth was only one year old. Katie was then six years old and Matthew was seven years old.
The Hinkley case settled in 1996 and I was approached about the movie and giving up my rights in 1995. It wasn’t until late 1997 or 1998 that they really started gearing up for the movie, finding writer Susannah Grant and the director Steven Soderberg and eventually Julia Roberts. The movie came out in May of 2000 and the kids were then 17, 16 and 9. 12 years have now passed since the first film and the kids are now 30, 28 and 22. I could not be prouder.
What PG&E did was real. Don’t be fooled by other things that you have read. As early as 1965 this company knew that the facility in Hinkley, California was contaminating the ground water with high levels of hexavalent chromium and they chose to cover it up.